Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by Shampoo Efficient @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:18 pm

deevlash wrote:
PeteG wrote: AbbyWinters

That site has led me to the conclusion that Australia is full of munters with hairy vaginas


And yet, there is the odd half-dozen who are ruinable
Shampoo Efficient
 
Posts: 1600
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:35 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by WD40 @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:21 pm

PeteG wrote:
deevlash wrote:
PeteG wrote: AbbyWinters

That site has led me to the conclusion that Australia is full of munters with hairy vaginas


And yet, there is the odd half-dozen who are ruinable


Both points equally true of just about everywhere (by which I mean England and by pure inference the rest of the entire world), based on reasonably extensive, but not exhaustive field research.
WD40
 
Posts: 34079
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by deev @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:23 pm

Illustrious_Len wrote:
PeteG wrote:
deevlash wrote:
PeteG wrote: AbbyWinters

That site has led me to the conclusion that Australia is full of munters with hairy vaginas


And yet, there is the odd half-dozen who are ruinable


Both points equally true of just about everywhere (by which I mean England and by pure inference the rest of the entire world), based on reasonably extensive, but not exhaustive field research.

but every other country puts its best looking 5% of sluts into its porno industry, if thats Australias best 5% I dont want to go there. I assume Danni Minogue is some kind of Tasmanian or something.
User avatar
deev
Banger King
 
Posts: 14576
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: Giffnock
Highscores: 3

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by Shampoo Efficient @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:25 pm

deevlash wrote:
Illustrious_Len wrote:
PeteG wrote:
deevlash wrote:
PeteG wrote: AbbyWinters

That site has led me to the conclusion that Australia is full of munters with hairy vaginas


And yet, there is the odd half-dozen who are ruinable


Both points equally true of just about everywhere (by which I mean England and by pure inference the rest of the entire world), based on reasonably extensive, but not exhaustive field research.

but every other country puts its best looking 5% of sluts into its porno industry, if thats Australias best 5% I dont want to go there. I assume Danni Minogue is some kind of Tasmanian or something.


Or lived in some sort of place where Natalie Imbruglia was also born. And they had there teenage sexual awakenings together. At 18.
Shampoo Efficient
 
Posts: 1600
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:35 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by WD40 @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:29 pm

deevlash wrote:but every other country puts its best looking 5% of sluts into its porno industry, if thats Australias best 5% I dont want to go there. I assume Danni Minogue is some kind of Tasmanian or something.


PeteG wrote:Or lived in some sort of place where Natalie Imbruglia was also born. And they had there teenage sexual awakenings together. At 18.


With Elle MacPherson & Nicole Kidman and a few others I can't think of right now. I could be wrong but Aussies generally are quite anti-porn in their atttiude so perhaps that explains the anomaly. I've met quite a few Aussie girls over here and you would most of them. Not just me, but you Deev. Properly fit women. Perhaps they send all the fit ones to SW London instead? :shrug:
WD40
 
Posts: 34079
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by deev @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:36 pm

Yeah I assume they export the fit ones to trick people into visiting australia and impregnating the munters whilst pissed on Fosters.

On a related note Australia banned small breasted porn because it looks kinda like kiddie porn, even if it looks like a woman with small breasts.
User avatar
deev
Banger King
 
Posts: 14576
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: Giffnock
Highscores: 3

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by WD40 @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:37 pm

deevlash wrote:On a related note Australia banned small breasted porn because it looks kinda like kiddie porn, even if it looks like a woman with small breasts.


That's also why bald fannies are banned in Japanese porn IIRC. However much else they dress them up to look like schoolgirls...
WD40
 
Posts: 34079
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by deev @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:39 pm

Illustrious_Len wrote:
deevlash wrote:On a related note Australia banned small breasted porn because it looks kinda like kiddie porn, even if it looks like a woman with small breasts.


That's also why bald fannies are banned in Japanese porn IIRC. However much else they dress them up to look like schoolgirls...

they blur out the minge anyway, spoilsports.
User avatar
deev
Banger King
 
Posts: 14576
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: Giffnock
Highscores: 3

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by Great Pretender @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:41 pm

deevlash wrote: pissed on Fosters.



Is that actually possible?
User avatar
Great Pretender
 
Posts: 2337
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Up my own arse

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by WD40 @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:43 pm

Great Pretender wrote:
deevlash wrote: pissed on Fosters.



Is that actually possible?


No, the chemically rankness of it makes you throw up long before you get drunk. Then you're back to the start again.
WD40
 
Posts: 34079
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by minimoog @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:44 pm

deevlash wrote:
Illustrious_Len wrote:
PeteG wrote:
deevlash wrote:
PeteG wrote: AbbyWinters

That site has led me to the conclusion that Australia is full of munters with hairy vaginas


And yet, there is the odd half-dozen who are ruinable


Both points equally true of just about everywhere (by which I mean England and by pure inference the rest of the entire world), based on reasonably extensive, but not exhaustive field research.

but every other country puts its best looking 5% of sluts into its porno industry, if thats Australias best 5% I dont want to go there. I assume Danni Minogue is some kind of Tasmanian or something.


'Perfection' gets boring incredibly quickly, after which the girl-next-door look can suddenly begin to appeal. Against expectations, often.

A conventional hottie is still a hottie, but it's possible to see raunch in other forms. Especially in huge beavers :D
User avatar
minimoog
 
Posts: 9328
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:03 am

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by deev @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:46 pm

Illustrious_Len wrote:
Great Pretender wrote:
deevlash wrote: pissed on Fosters.



Is that actually possible?


No, the chemically rankness of it makes you throw up long before you get drunk. Then you're back to the start again.

my usual tipple is tennents, fosters is exotic.
User avatar
deev
Banger King
 
Posts: 14576
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: Giffnock
Highscores: 3

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by WD40 @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:46 pm

minimoog wrote:'Perfection' gets boring incredibly quickly, after which the girl-next-door look can suddenly begin to appeal. Against expectations, often.


:yes:
WD40
 
Posts: 34079
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or very wrong?

Post by HeavySoul @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:48 pm

Personally I don't find porn wrong in many senses as long as it is all consensual and that.

The only thing I am completely against is anything involving animals. They have no say in the matter and I can't imagine any animal involved in stuff like that is ever being treated well. I guess this sits in the 'bad' judgement area for me because I am an animal lover. Whilst I realise it gets some people 'off', I will never agree it is right.

The whole feminist view of things is pretty skewed. The women are treated as meat and objectified they may say, and to a degree they are, but then this is the sort of thing that can excite men. Also this can turn women on too as some like that dominated approach (apparently!). As someone said above, no one ever moans about men being treated 'badly' either. Of course there will be times when girl/women/men are shadily guided into the work to feed drug habits and the like but this could be said of many a profession which is less scandalous and 'dirty'.

I think it is good that porn exists because otherwise people might go about feeding certain urges in a more realistic way. I think the ease and breath of choice the internet gives the world has meant plenty of desensitisation and progressing into harder stuff to get the same kicks generally. With this comes ideas and suggestions that could cheer up a stale relationship in some cases but on the flip side may also lead partners to expect 'more' then their partners are willing to give/try and break down an otherwise healthy partnership perhaps.
User avatar
HeavySoul
 
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:56 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by WD40 @ Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:57 pm

Exactly the dilemmas porn presents HS and why decrying it as either a good or bad thing for society is practically impossible IMO.

N.B: Thread title changed to reflect this/the OP more accurately.
WD40
 
Posts: 34079
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by deev @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:02 am

max hardcore is very very wrong, I saw one of his things and that was possibly the most disturbing thing ever, I think he's in jail now.
User avatar
deev
Banger King
 
Posts: 14576
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: Giffnock
Highscores: 3

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by LHD @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:15 am

Porn.

Financed my formative years and bought me my first two cars.
LHD
 
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 11:41 pm
Location: Loafing about...

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by Great Pretender @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:16 am

LHD wrote:Porn.

Financed my formative years and bought me my first two cars.


You were an actor?
User avatar
Great Pretender
 
Posts: 2337
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:07 pm
Location: Up my own arse

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by deev @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:18 am

Great Pretender wrote:
LHD wrote:Porn.

Financed my formative years and bought me my first two cars.


You were an actor?

fluffer for gay porn probably
User avatar
deev
Banger King
 
Posts: 14576
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: Giffnock
Highscores: 3

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by LHD @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:21 am

Great Pretender wrote:
LHD wrote:Porn.

Financed my formative years and bought me my first two cars.


You were an actor?


No.

I was a distributor.

It was in the days before widespread internet access and DVD.

I had 10 video recorders set up to duplicate the hardcore dutch filth that i bought via mail order.

I was clearing £400 a week when i was 17.
LHD
 
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 11:41 pm
Location: Loafing about...

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by NNK @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:35 am

deevlash wrote:max hardcore is very very wrong, I saw one of his things and that was possibly the most disturbing thing ever, I think he's in jail now.


I hope some of his cell mates try the sort of stuff he was doing to girls.
NNK
 
Posts: 8112
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:54 pm
Location: NZ

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by Mavis Biscuits @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:41 am

I have no problem with porn, but, like Firkin, hate the stuff that tries to have a plot - just show me the action please! As long as it's among consenting adults then it's fine by me.
User avatar
Mavis Biscuits
 
Posts: 644
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: Under a rock somewhere

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by WD40 @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 8:59 am

LHD wrote:
Great Pretender wrote:
LHD wrote:Porn.

Financed my formative years and bought me my first two cars.


You were an actor?


No.

I was a distributor.

It was in the days before widespread internet access and DVD.

I had 10 video recorders set up to duplicate the hardcore dutch filth that i bought via mail order.

I was clearing £400 a week when i was 17.


LHD the secret porn baron. Brilliant 8-)
WD40
 
Posts: 34079
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by WD40 @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:00 am

Not now Kato wrote:
deevlash wrote:max hardcore is very very wrong, I saw one of his things and that was possibly the most disturbing thing ever, I think he's in jail now.


I hope some of his cell mates try the sort of stuff he was doing to girls.


Precis for those of us not acquainted with his work - and who don't want to go looking for it by the sound of it? Violent stuff?
WD40
 
Posts: 34079
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:12 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by Firkin @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:02 am

LHD wrote:
Great Pretender wrote:
LHD wrote:Porn.

Financed my formative years and bought me my first two cars.


You were an actor?


No.

I was a distributor.

It was in the days before widespread internet access and DVD.

I had 10 video recorders set up to duplicate the hardcore dutch filth that i bought via mail order.

I was clearing £400 a week when i was 17.


:rofl: :clap:
User avatar
Firkin
 
Posts: 7333
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by Speedchick @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:09 am

I haven't seen all that many films, but like most others, as long as it's consenting and all parties are happy with what's going on, then I don't see a problem.

But.... I have to ask, why the hell do the women always leave their shoes on? I saw one where she started in jeans and cowboy boots, and before long she's undressed and getting a hammering, but still had the boots on? why????
Speedchick
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:43 pm
Location: East Lancashire

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by Disastrous @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:11 am

Speedchick wrote:I haven't seen all that many films, but like most others, as long as it's consenting and all parties are happy with what's going on, then I don't see a problem.

But.... I have to ask, why the hell do the women always leave their shoes on? I saw one where she started in jeans and cowboy boots, and before long she's undressed and getting a hammering, but still had the boots on? why????



I dunno. It works though.
User avatar
Disastrous
Monkey Licker!
 
Posts: 39044
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:58 pm

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by NNK @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:30 am

Many a time have I asked young ladies to leave their boots on, or put them back on if they've had to take jeans off.
I cant wait for my Alzheimers to start then I wont remember all this stuff from my murky (pre married) past.
NNK
 
Posts: 8112
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:54 pm
Location: NZ

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by Speedchick @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:02 pm

So basically, all you guys have a shoe fetish?
Speedchick
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:43 pm
Location: East Lancashire

Re: Porn: Right, wrong or otherwise?

Post by onomatopoeia @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:13 pm

Speedchick wrote:So basically, all you guys have a shoe fetish?


Not all, at least I don't.
onomatopoeia
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: not Portishead any more

PreviousNext

Return to Where has Random Chat gone??

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

yt
  Enable youtube titles
cron